Comments for Almost Legally

Comment on HAHAHAHAHA by monica

monica — Wed, 27 Jan 2010 22:02:03 +0000

HAHAHAHAHAHAAH – this is ridiculous.

Comment on (Almost) Dead? by Huma

Huma — Thu, 05 Nov 2009 16:35:14 +0000

So secretive. Is this post going to self-destruct in 3…2…1…?

POW.

Crap. That was from the Ding-Dong I just put in the microwave. I really wanted that, too.

Comment on Elementally, Dear Watson by Almost Legally » Blog Archive » (File) Sharing is Not Caring

Almost Legally » Blog Archive » (File) Sharing is Not Caring — Mon, 10 Aug 2009 01:03:01 +0000

[...] think it’s safe to say that it could have gone better.A few weeks back, I wrote about JNOVs, noting that …when a judge overrules a jury, and issues a verdict notwithstanding the jury, [...]

Comment on Who’s the Man? Wu’s the Man. by Adam

Adam — Thu, 09 Jul 2009 15:04:26 +0000

Thanks for the reference to CDT!

Comment on Who’s the Man? Wu’s the Man. by Almost Legally » Blog Archive » Elementally, Dear Watson

Almost Legally » Blog Archive » Elementally, Dear Watson — Thu, 09 Jul 2009 11:37:40 +0000

[...] « Who’s the Man? Wu’s the Man. [...]

Comment on Terms of Service by Almost Legally » Blog Archive » Who’s the Man? Wu’s the Man.

Thu, 09 Jul 2009 01:13:12 +0000

[...] while back, I wrote about Lori Drew. She’s the woman who was indicted for violating a federal anti-hacking [...]

Comment on Death and Whackings by angela tran

angela tran — Mon, 01 Jun 2009 17:08:36 +0000

I don’t think I’ve ever found learning about taxes delightful before now.

Comment on One Way or Another by Dominic

Dominic — Sun, 31 May 2009 17:02:31 +0000

I apologize for letting your comment languish in my spam queue for two weeks.

I completely agree with pretty much everything you said. I don’t know exactly how much the technology changes the game, but it clearly does change the game. A single officer can monitor dozens of locations at a single time.

And I agree with the need for openness. If we’re committed to an open society, the government should be the first to be open about its plans and its capabilities.

Comment on One Way or Another by beager

beager — Tue, 12 May 2009 12:49:55 +0000

In my mind, there’s no difference the two scenarios, except the ease and power of the information when technology is used. And that’s where people have an issue. People are comfortable with having “slices” of publicity, e.g. being spotted at the grocery, being seen on the street, going to the DMV, etc. But they’re not used to being constantly public, which the technology makes easier. It doesn’t change the game, it just pushes the bounds.

What is needed, however, it a guarantee to the public that the same is available to them. If big brother is spying on them, they need a way to spy back. And that’s something that “the man” doesn’t want you to do. And by “the man”, I mean Barbara Streisand.

Comment on Exampocalypse 4: This Time It’s Personal by brian

brian — Sun, 03 May 2009 21:24:54 +0000

I prefer “Test Master 3: The Examining” myself